STARS $200k Renewal Research Grant Awardees

 

The Rationality of Ultimate Value: Emotion, Awareness, and Causality in Virtue Ethics and Decision Neuroscience

Project Summary
The goal of this project is a deeper understanding of the nature of virtue in relation to the transcendent.  How is virtue related to rationality, emotions, and concepts of ultimate value? A unique aspect of this project is the attempt to understand persons who are exemplars of virtue – either historical exemplars, such as long-term caregivers for the mentally disabled, or persons whose behavior in economic games is exemplary of fairness and generosity. The project studies exemplars with respect to the implicit conceptual “schemas” by which they understand themselves and the world (including their orientation to something transcendent, or concepts of ultimate value), their psychological makeup, and their patterns of brain activity while making virtue-relevant decisions.  The research program will also foster discussions among philosophers, theologians, psychologists, and neuroscientists regarding the nature of transcendence and a theory of virtue that focuses on the personal traits and character of virtuous exemplars.  Finally, the progress being made in this project will be shared with larger audiences in graduate courses and public lectures.

Progress
Thus far, this project has created exciting new approaches to research on moral action and virtue. Most remarkably, the project has yielded a novel approach to neuroscience and psychological study of virtuous exemplars within a laboratory context.  We have also successfully used semantic analysis to probe for transcendent concepts in the schemas of virtuous exemplars.  Finally, our team has formulated a philosophical understanding of virtue that both incorporates this new scientific research and argues for the critical importance of transcendence and exemplarity in moral action.

 

Relationship to Transcendence and Ultimate Reality
A core question of this project is the degree to which a virtuous person’s mental “schemas” (of themselves and of the world) involve a representation of transcendent realities and ultimate values, and the degree to which these are important in their virtuous behavior and character.

 

Warren Brown
Peterson
Kevin Reimer
Michael Spezio
James Van Slyke
Warren Brown, Professor of Psychology, Graduate School of Psychology, Fuller Theological Seminary,
Pasadena, CA
(Co-Principal Investigator)

Gregory Peterson, Associate Professor, South Dakota State University
(Co-Principal Investigator)

Kevin Reimer, Professor of Psychology,
Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, CA

Michael Spezio, Assistant Professor, Scripps College; Visiting Scientist, California Institute of Technology, California
James Van Slyke, Adjunct Professor, Azusa Pacific University, Azusa, California

 

 

Team Project Consultants
Ralph Adolphs, Ph.D., Bren Professor, California Institute of Technology.
            Area: Affective, Social & Decision Neuroscience
Colin Camerer, Ph.D., Axline Professor, California Institute of Technology
            Area: Neuroeconomics, Decision Neuroscience
Nancey Murphy, Ph.D., Professor, Fuller Theological Seminary
            Area: Philosophy, Theology, Ethics
Steven Quartz, Ph.D., Associate Professor, California Institute of Technology
            Area: Philosophy of Mind, Philosophy of Decision-Making, Social & Decision Neuroscience
Lawrence Walker, Ph.D., Professor, University of British Columbia
            Area: Developmental Moral Psychology
James F. Woodward, Ph.D., Koepfli Professor, California Institute of Technology
            Area: Philosophy of Science, Causation, Philosophy of Mind
Linda Zagzebski, Ph.D., Kingfisher College Chair, University of Oklahoma
            Area: Virtue Theory, Philosophy of Religion

 

 

CTNS-STARS 2400 Ridge Road, Berkeley, CA 94709-1212
Tel: 510-848-8152 Fax: 510-848-2535
ctns-stars@ctns.org

 

www.ctnsstars.org

www.ctns.org